The NDP provides the first response to questions on adult education and literacy

On September 8th, a statement from a network of organizations and researchers in adult education was released which included a series of questions for each of the political parties in the upcoming election (see my blog post: International Literacy Day – It’s time to get back on track).

Since that time, more than 60 people have added their names to the statement (you can read the original statement and the names of those who have signed on at

To date, we have received one response which is from the New Democratic Party – NDP Response. La version française peut être trouvé à:

I am hopeful that the other parties will respond soon so we can compare and contrast their various positions.

Here is the text of the NDP’s response:

  1. What are your commitments with regard to adult literacy and skills development?

NDP Response: Literacy and basic skills are central to the enjoyment of health, job opportunities and community participation. Under the Conservative government, adult literacy and learning just hasn’t been a priority. The Conservatives repeatedly allowed funding for literacy and essential skills to lapse, leaving funds for vital programming simply unspent: this happened to 31% of the total budget of the Adult Learning, Literacy and Essential Skills Program in 2013-14.

An NDP government will make adult literacy and skills development a priority, ensuring that the funds devoted to these important programs get spent and working with stakeholders to ensure that Canadians have access the to the skills training and literacy programs they need.

  1. Will you commit to play a strong and positive leadership role in promoting literacy, according to federal jurisdiction? If so, how will this leadership be put into effect?

NDP Response: The NDP recognizes how important literacy is for many facets of life, including economic and social participation. That’s why an NDP government will play a strong and positive leadership role in promoting literacy. We will ensure that funding dedicated to literacy and essential skills is actually spent, and we will work with stakeholders to identify priorities and best practices, and scale-up the most promising approaches across the country.

  1. Will your party commit to adopt measures that comply with constitutional obligations regarding the linguistic rights of Francophone Canadians who live in a minority context? If so, please provide concrete illustrations of this

NDP Response: The NDP is fully committed to complying with the Constitution and to protecting the linguistic rights of Canadians. For Canadians to be able to exercise those rights, the federal government needs to ensure that the proper resources are there. The NDP has called on the government to increase its support for the Roadmap for Canada’s Official Languages which includes funds for access to education in the minority language.

The NDP was strongly opposed to the abolition of the Court Challenge Program. This program provided essential resources to ensure the protection and enhancement of minority language rights. We also voiced our concerns with the Languages Rights Support Program, as it seems to respond only in part to communities’ needs.

In terms of Official Languages, the NDP has long track record of proposing concrete actions to protect and promote Canada’s official languages. We tabled a bill – which was adopted – to make all officers of Parliament bilingual when they are appointed. We also tabled bills on multiple occasions to ensure Supreme Court of Canada judges are bilingual. Unlike the Conservatives, whose actions have moved us backwards, and the Liberals, who have not been proactive, the NDP has been proposing initiatives to support and strengthen our official languages.

  1. Are you willing to fund a stable infrastructure that will allow for the fulfillment of multiple functions such as information, innovation, research and sharing of expertise in the field of literacy and skills development?

NDP Response: Under the guise of directing money to where it was needed most, the Conservatives cut funding for literacy organizations. They argued that resources were being wasted on administration and research, but the reality is that the Conservatives simply allowed a large portion of literacy funding to lapse instead of redirecting it towards new projects.

The NDP recognizes that effective literacy programs require a wide range of activities, including research, information sharing, innovating, and scaling up best practices. We also recognize the reality that organizations have overhead costs, and that without funding for administration many essential tasks can simply not be done. That’s why an NDP government will reverse the Conservatives short-sighted approach to funding and will work with the sector to ensure that core funding is available for the full range of programs necessary.

  1. Do you agree to integrate literacy and essential skills development into sectoral policies, where these aspects are relevant, such as, for example, employment policies, policies related to Aboriginal people, health, the environment, culture, and the promotion of official languages?

NDP Response: Certain populations struggle more with literacy and basic skills than others. Literacy levels and training are certainly of great concern among Indigenous peoples, for instance. That’s why an NDP government supports policies to increase literacy and basic skills among Indigenous peoples, including support for education and ASETS. We will also ensure that literacy and essential skills are considered in other sectors as required.

  1. Do you support the inclusion of literacy and skills development funding in the Employment Insurance Fund and the Canada Job Grant?

NDP Response: The NDP supports the inclusion of literacy and essential skills development in the Labour Market Development Agreements signed with the provinces and the federal funding provided to the provinces in support of these agreements. The NDP’s commitment to expand access to EI benefits will also ensure that more Canadians are eligible for skills training paid for through the EI Account.

  1. Will you implement Canada’s commitments to UNESCO and on the international stage in the fields of literacy and adult education (UNESCO’s Education 2030 Framework for Action (2015), Recommendation on the Development of Adult Education (2015), Bélem Framework for Action (2009) and Hamburg Declaration on Adult Education (1997))?

NDP Response: Yes. The NDP believes that it’s time we stopped being a laggard on the international stage and started living up to our international commitments, including our commitments on adult education.


About Brigid Hayes

Brigid Hayes has developed an expertise in learning that spans over 30 years as a senior government policy advisor and program manager and partnership developer; director of labour for a national business/labour skills centre and as an independent consultant. Her knowledge of and experience in workplace literacy and learning has contributed to her recognition as an expert in this field, and she has undertaken significant activities to both help promote and enhance literacy and lifelong learning. Brigid works as an independent consultant and expert advisor on learning, literacy, and work. She has successfully developed a strategic planning and policy development practice involving workplace literacy, essential skills, partnership development, research, and evaluation.
This entry was posted in Canada Job Grant, Federal Election 2015, Federal Government and Literacy, Labour Market Agreements, Literacy and Essential Skills. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The NDP provides the first response to questions on adult education and literacy

  1. Excellent that one of them responded. I’ve been asking for a position on similar items, and so far nothing but silence. While a lot of this falls within provincial jurisdiction, there’s a real need for some national vision and national leadership. We have a discussion group on LinkedIn around the creation of national skills/qualifications/competency framework – we’d welcome your contributions to the dialogue!

    • Brigid Hayes says:

      Thanks Jeff for your comments and the invite to your discussion group – I’ll check it out. Hopefully we’ll hear from the other parties before too long. Brigid

  2. Reblogged this on Adult Basic Education is a Basic Right and commented:
    Brigid Hayes’ shares her thoughts on the NDP response to questions about their adult education electoral platform. We still hope to receive a response from the LPC and the CPC. Over 60 individuals and groups have signed the CDEACF call to ‘get adult education back on track’. You can read the CDEACF call and the NDP response here

  3. Pingback: Liberals provide their response to questions on adult education and literacy | As I was saying…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.